Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

etcd: Updated to v3.5.4 #110033

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 2, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mk46
Copy link
Member

@mk46 mk46 commented May 13, 2022

What type of PR is this?

Add one of the following kinds:
/kind bug
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Update etcd to v3.5.4.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #109707

Special notes for your reviewer:

/hold dependency on #110031

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

- etcd: Update to v3.5.4

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels May 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mk46. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/kubeadm area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider area/test sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels May 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from fejta and ibabou May 13, 2022 08:20
@mk46
Copy link
Member Author

mk46 commented May 13, 2022

/cc @serathius @jpbetz

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

Note, I have two backports of .3 in the queue but these are not apparoved yet.

#109533
#109532

Overall +1 to update etcd in k8s more frequently.

23: "3.5.3-0",
24: "3.5.3-0",
23: "3.5.4-0",
24: "3.5.4-0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please change all 3.5.x versions in kubeadm to 3.5.4

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@roycaihw
Copy link
Member

/cc @jpbetz @wenjiaswe
/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 28, 2022
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented May 30, 2022

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 30, 2022
@mk46
Copy link
Member Author

mk46 commented May 30, 2022

re-hold for kubernetes/k8s.io#3790
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. do-not-merge/contains-merge-commits Indicates a PR which contains merge commits. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels May 30, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/contains-merge-commits Indicates a PR which contains merge commits. label Jun 1, 2022
@mk46
Copy link
Member Author

mk46 commented Jun 1, 2022

/hold cancel
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 1, 2022
@mk46 mk46 requested a review from neolit123 June 2, 2022 16:59
Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2022
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jun 2, 2022

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, mk46, neolit123

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/kubeadm area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

etcd: Update to v3.5.4
6 participants